Counsel for Pilatus Bank, which is continuing to seek to obtain Discovery from the former Competent Person (Administrator) who was charged with winding up the bank's affairs after it lost its license, apparently either doesn;' understand, or does not wish to abide by the Court's last order, which dismissed the case if service was not timely effected. The attorneys have today, March 1, submitted an Order on Motion to Extend Time. Can't they see that the Court never signed the order they submitted back on January 21 ?
We trust that they are not trying to finesse a resuscitation of a case that was ordered dismissed if no service was accomplished by the Court-imposed deadline. Will someone please advise Sadr that it is no longer active, and most likely must be refiled.