
In the Maduro and Saab cases now pending in the United States, We will be seeing reminders of the status of the Republic of Malta as the money laundering jurisdiction of choice for Venezuelan laundrymen. For those who are not familiar with this subject, a few examples are appropriate:
(1) Alex Saab's illicit Venezuelan supply chains and oil trades, to and through Malta-registered companies he and his associates controlled.
(2) Saab frequently relied on Malta's offshore banking system and opaque corporate transparency to divert hundreds of millions of dollars from low-cost housing and food welfare programs in Venezuela, into safe destinations abroad.
(3) Maduro's alleged use of a private Maltese investment firms and PORTMANN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT to move €160m in a money laundering conspiracy connected to embezzlement from the government oil agency, PDVSA.
(4) The abuse of Malta's financial system for President Maduro's three stepsons' illicit activities, involving massive food import fraud, facilitated by Saab.
And while we are on the subject, American compliance officers who were aware of the activities of the money laundering Maltese entity, PILATUS BANK, and who anxiously awaited indictments in the United States after the election of Joe Biden, only to be acutely disappointed when the DOJ failed for charge the Iranian owner, are still wondering whether politics played a role. The ability of Malta's money launderers to act with impunity, free from law enforcement action against what amounts to a racketeering enterprise masquerading as a sovereign state, continues to confound observers, as the US and UK pointedly ignore major criminal operations originating in Malta.
Anyway, a lot of it will come out, once again in the Maduro and Saab cases; all the cases of American law enforcement malpractice, regarding Malta, will be front and center once more. We wonder what the DOJ will say now.










