THE LAST TIME I WAS IN NEVIS, IT DEFINITELY WAS NOT AS A TOURIST

My decade as a career money launderer, while it resulted in a period of time as a guest of the Bureau of Prisons, it also left me with a skillset regarding money laundering tradecraft that I have subsequently applied as a consultant to media outlets seeking to use that dark knowledge for investigative purposes, in order to expose financial crime. If you ever saw the groundbreaking series that Al Jazeera's Washington DC office did on corruption in the Citizenship by Investment program in Dominica, I was the technical adviser on that program. Those journalists went on to examine the economic citizenship scandal in Cyprus; their story ended up causing that government to terminate the program altogether.

Not long after 9/11, I was engaged by one of America's three major networks to expose the ongoing money laundering industry in Saint Kitts, being operated by local attorneys there. If you read my autobiography THE LAUNDRY MAN, you know that I spent a substantial amount of time there, moving and cleaning the proceeds of narcotics crime for American clients working in Miami, and engaged in trafficking. My goal was now, however, to implicate Kittitian lawyers on camera, while actively engaged in advising them on laundering money for foreign clients. You may remember someone later did the same thing in New York City, showing that some American lawyers weren't themselves above doing the same thing.

I had a client from the old days, long since reformed, who looked a lot like Bin Ladin; he also had a prominent scar on his neck from a bullet wound, when he was once left for dead in a drug transaction gone bad. That was my choice for "customer" who would be seeking money laundering advice. We paired him up with a young lady from a New York company that specialized in covert surveillance. She was to be his current romantic partner, and she was discreetly wired up for video and audio, on her purse and hat.

So as not to alert our targets, the production team and yours truly stayed at the Four Seasons in Nevis, coming over each morning to hit our targets in downtown Basseterre. Our recording equipment was secreted in a nondescript van which was close enough to various lawyers' offices to pick up the signals. as our duo visited several attorneys, delivering intentionally transparent stories about how they needed to hide money offshore from prying eyes.

We stung several lawyers, as well as a sitting magistrate, all of whom implicated themselves in short order. The footage was outstanding, but after we returned, network counsel killed any chance of airing the story, fearing lawsuits from the lawyers, and possible blowback from the government of St. Kitts & Nevis, so the program never was broadcast. That's the last time I had a reason to visit Nevis.

DOMINICA REVOKED 68 PASSPORTS PURCHASED AT AN ILLEGAL DISCOUNT, BUT CONTINUES TO ALLOW ITS CONSULTANTS, AT SAAD AHSAN IMMIGRATION, WHO SOLD 19 OF THEM TO PAKISTANI NATIONALS, TO MARKET ITS CITIZENSHIPS; WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

                        

Meet AHSAN KHALIQ, the owner of SAAD AHSAN RESIDENCY & CITIZENSHIP, whose firm continues to be an authorized seller of Dominica CBI citizenship, notwithstanding that the Minister for Citizenship revoked the passports of nineteen Pakistani nationals for purchasing at an illegal discount. If you thought that was merely an oversight, think again, for Khaliq holds a Diplomatic passport issued by Dominica, which he brandishes to show prospective CBI customers how he is operating under official authority. In truth and in fact, Dominica freely allows its passport sellers to break its CBI laws and regulations, and to violate the Memorandum of Agreement, to which it is a signatory. When it comes to Dominica CBI, anything goes.

For readers who wish to actually see the relevant portions of CITIZENSHIP DEPRIVATION ORDER 2024:

Perhaps Dominica's Prime Minister ROOSEVELT SKERRIT might wish to explain to the new regulatory body, the Eastern Caribbean Citizenship by Investment Regulatory Authority (ECCIRA), why it has failed to adhere to the international agreement he signed, and which binds Dominica, as it does the other four EC CBI & CIP selling states. No wonder the United States so distrusts Dominica's CBI program that it has essentially suspended the ability of Dominica passport holders to secure visas to visit America.

WILL ANY OF THE DEPOSITORS WHO HAD FUNDS IN NEVIS' HAMILTON BANK RECOVER THEIR MONEY?

We are advised that some of the litigation filed by depositors at HAMILTON RESERVE BANK could result in final judgments on or about September 15. Some of the plaintiffs, who allege that they have not been able to withdraw any of their funds from the bank, have also sued the local regulatory agency, the FSRC, the Nevisian Minister of Finance, who is currently the Premier, and the Attorney General.

The question becomes, who will recover their funds, and who might be unsuccessful? The allegations of failure to supervise the bank, on the part of the regulator and the minister, add an additional unknown to the possible outcome. Will the Government of Saint Kitts & Nevis, seeking to avoid the international damage which might emerge from any proof of negligent supervision, pay off some of the claimants, leaving others with only an uncollectible judgment? or will the Premier himself step in, and see if some, but not all, of the alleged victims are paid, either from bank assets or even government funds, to save his political career? Right now, there are far too many unknowns to be able to answer that question.

We will continue to monitor the litigation, and update our readers accordingly. New readers might want to review our prior coverage of the litigation.

VISA RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED LAST DECEMBER UPON ANTIGUA WAS THE DIRECT RESULT OF A ROGUE CIP PROGRAM; DO NOT LET THE ABLP PROPAGANDA MILL DECEIVE YOU IN THINKING IT WAS BECAUSE OF ANTIGUA'S DEPORTATION REFUSAL

If you have actually read the official United States ruling imposing major restrictions upon the ability of Antiguans to obtain a visa to enter the United States, you know that the sole reasons are directly connected to the country's Citizenship by Investment (CIP) passport program. Public statements made this week, by Antigua's Prime Minister, GASTON BROWNE, claiming that the reason was his failure to accept third country deportees, is untrue, and made for purely political purposes to confuse Antiguans, and divert them from the painful truth. We consider this to be misleading propaganda specifically designed to deceive them.

The Presidential Policy Statement, which is enforced by the Department of State, as the visa issuing authority, specifically states that the Antiguan government's deficiencies in screening and vetting applicants, is the true reason for the sanctions. the ability of inadequately screened, or even unscreened, applicants constitutes a direct National Security risk to the united States. Many individuals from high risk countries, and even jurisdictions designated State Sponsor of Terrorism, have received Antigua CIP passports, which allow them to apply to enter America, greatly increasing the risk that they will engage in white collar crime, money laundering, fraud, terrorist financing and terrorist acts against the United States.

Therefore, Antiguans must understand, and accept as fact, that, so long as Antigua maintains and operates a flawed and defective CIP program, the visa sanctions imposed by President Trump og December 15, 2025 will not only remain in place, they may be modified or even increased. Unfortunately, we do not see the Government of Antigua taking any substantive action to clean up and reform the CIP program, so do not plan any visits to the United States for the foreseeable future. Clean up your program, or accept the current situation for the indefinite future.

_________________________________________________

THE ANATOMY OF DENIAL: ANALYZING THE "FACILITATOR'S PLAYBOOK" PART 2

PROUD AMERICAN STUDIOS: THE NEW INVESTIGATIVE NEWS COMPANY

                                                  Act. US Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed by Dean Cain.

Reaching 30 million views across its website and X account is a major milestone for Proud American Studios, a fast-growing conservative news organization.

The concept behind the network is simple: a team of former Homeland Security agents, former CIA officers, former DEA agents, former FBI personnel, and former members of the U.S. military investigate major issues and report the news through a series of podcasts and investigative programs.

Actor Dean Cain, well known for his Hollywood career and his work with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has also joined the network, hosting the podcast The Homeland.

Proud American Studios has already conducted interviews with several senior officials in the Trump administration, including Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Tom Homan, Sebastian Gorka, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The network has a clear editorial focus. In addition to covering national politics, it seeks to expose what it describes as hostile foreign influence directed against the United States, particularly from China, as well as Marxist propaganda throughout the Western Hemisphere. These issues are examined in The Western Hemisphere, hosted by former U.N. Ambassador Ian 'Patches' Liburd.

Geopolitical developments in the Middle East and Europe are analyzed in The Heavy, hosted by Philippe Martinez.

Following its rapid growth, Proud American Studios is preparing a series of major investigative documentaries focusing on drug trafficking networks operating in the United States and throughout the Caribbean, along with other issues affecting U.S. national security.

I encourage my readers to follow this unique team of men and women who have served and protected the United States. They report the news from the perspective of experienced professionals who have worked in law enforcement, intelligence, and national security, bringing with them an exceptional network of contacts and firsthand experience.

The network is led by President Michael Koscielniak, a former Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agent, whose decades of federal law enforcement experience help guide Proud American Studios' investigative mission and editorial direction.

For Further reading: 

PROUD AMERICAN STUDIOS

 

READ DOMINICA'S CBI GUIDELINES THAT IT REFUSES TO ENFORCE, NOTWITHSTANDING THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THAT IT SIGNED

 

Here it is, plain as day, Dominica's CBI regulations for its sales agents, who received formal notification back in 2019 that they violate them upon pain of "AUTOMATIC BLACKLISTING." If you wanted to know why the Commonwealth of Dominica is completely ignoring the agents who break its laws, the termination of UK visa-free admission, more than two years ago made Dominica CBI less competitive than its SKN and SLU neighbors, so with a wink and a nod, Prime Minister ROOSEVELT SKERRIT signaled to its salesmen abroad that anything goes. Hence the almost universal use of deep discounting, uop to 60%, to sell Dominica CBI ahead of Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Saint Lucia, passports.

Read this document carefully; you will see that there are a half dozen other legal requirements that agents abroad are consistently failing to abide by, yet they are still selling Dominica. When will this end?

WILL A FUTURE DOMINICA GOVERNMENT REVOKE ALL THOSE ILLEGALLY DISCOUNTED PASSPORTS?

What I am seeing, and my sources confirming, is that these three PAKISTAN-based CBI consultancies are selling DOMINICA citizenships at deep discounts from the legal minimums:

SAAD AHSAN IMMGRATION
FORECAST IMMIGRATION
MW IMMIGRATION

If and when there is regime change in the Commonwealth of Dominica, which could come, due to (1) the visa sanctions imposed by the USA (2) The two-year old termination of visa free status by the UK, and (3) ETIAS somtime this Fall to the EU, will the next Dominica government rule that these heavily discounted passports are void Ab Initio? That is precisely what I would do, notwithstanding that a prior government had accepted them. What will happen in Dominica?

THE ANATOMY OF DENIAL; ANALYZING THE FACILITATOR'S PLAYBOOK

"The interactions with Momil Khan and Neda Azarmehr are textbook examples of what I term 'The Facilitator's Denial.'

In my latest investigation into the systemic rot within certain CBI circles, I have encountered two distinct responses that perfectly illustrate the 'Facilitator’s Playbook.' When exposed, the actors behind these schemes rely on two primary tactics: Rebranding and Strategic Disengagement.

The Case of Momil Khan: Rebranding a Violation

When confronted with documented evidence of illegal discounts—a direct violation of the 2024 Memorandum of Agreement (MoA)—Momil Khan’s instinct was to label the act an 'overly ambitious marketing approach.' This is a classic attempt to sanitize a legal transgression. Selling a nation’s sovereignty at a deep discount is not 'marketing'; it is a systemic attack on the integrity of the program.

The Case of Neda Azarmehr: The 'Service Provider' Shield

Neda Azarmehr’s defense is even more revealing. She claims her involvement in the Grenada project was 'strictly limited to promotional and documentation support.' In the world of international financial crime, this is the standard defense of the facilitator. Facilitators rarely hold shares or decision-making power; instead, their role is to provide the veneer of legitimacy through marketing and documentation that allows fraudulent schemes to attract victims. 

Her admission that she 'severed all involvement' only after 'concerns arose' raises a critical question: What were those concerns, and why were they not identified during professional due diligence before the 'promotional support' began? To claim to be a mere 'service provider' while the machinery of a project is being questioned is an attempt to enjoy the profits of promoting illegal discounts and prices without the burden of accountability.

The Common Thread: Accountability vs. Ignorance*

Both Khan and Azarmehr attempt to hide behind professional terminology—'marketing oversight' or 'documentation support'—to evade the ethical responsibility of their roles. They want us to believe they are passive bystanders in a system they actively promoted.

Public accountability does not require a shareholder certificate; it requires an analysis of who provided the engine for these schemes. 

The evidence—the illegal price lists, the promotional campaigns, and the records of involvement—will remain *until the very day justice arrives. These are not 'false allegations'; they are the public record of a culture of impunity. 

Facilitators who operate in the shadows of legality must understand: promoting illegal discount prices is not a marketing error; it is a systemic attack on the integrity of CBI programs. By engaging in this predatory price war, facilitators like Momil Khan, Neda Azarmehr, and others are not just 'selling passports'—they are laundering the process and endangering the travel freedoms of every legitimate citizen of these nations."

Read also: https://rijock.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-untouchable-facilitators-why-rcbi.html?m=1

WE RESPOND TO A CBI CONSULTANT THAT ADVERTISED AN ILLEGAL DISCOUNT ON DOMINICA CBI PASSPORTS

Hello Momil, thank you for your message.

While I acknowledge your request, I find the description of this matter as an 'overly ambitious marketing approach' to be a glaring mischaracterization. To frame the promotion of illegal activities as a 'marketing oversight' is not only a misrepresentation of facts but a transparent attempt to evade the professional and ethical responsibilities inherent in your role. The damage caused by these actions—the devaluation of Dominica's sovereignty and the long-term harm to its citizens—cannot be rectified by simply deleting a social media campaign.

In my recent analysis of the 'Untouchable Facilitators' within the CBI industry, I have detailed exactly how agencies and vendors act as the engine of these schemes by promoting illegal discounts and distorting the truth to attract investors, and why they must be held fully accountable. 

https://rijock.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-untouchable-facilitators-why-rcbi.html?m=1

The long-term consequences—where citizens of Dominica bear the brunt of a devalued passport, and investors are exposed to travel bans, financial loss, and the potential revocation of their citizenship—cannot be erased by the removal of a post.

True corrective action requires more than deleting a post; it requires a commitment to ending the culture of impunity that allows facilitators to operate outside the law while claiming ignorance. The evidence, including the images, serves as a public record of these practices. For these reasons, and in the interest of transparency and accountability, the article and its accompanying evidence will remain for now. They will eventually be deleted.

I hope you and your organization will consider the real impact of these 'marketing' choices on the people of Dominica. I encourage you to move beyond 'corrective actions' on your own platforms and instead advocate for a transparent, legal, and ethical CBI process that respects both the laws and the people of Dominica.

Hello Momil, thank you for your message.

While I acknowledge your request, I find the description of this matter as an 'overly ambitious marketing approach' to be a glaring mischaracterization. To frame the promotion of illegal activities as a 'marketing oversight' is not only a misrepresentation of facts but a transparent attempt to evade the professional and ethical responsibilities inherent in your role. The damage caused by these actions—the devaluation of Dominica's sovereignty and the long-term harm to its citizens—cannot be rectified by simply deleting a social media campaign.

In my recent analysis of the 'Untouchable Facilitators' within the CBI industry, I have detailed exactly how agencies and vendors act as the engine of these schemes by promoting illegal discounts and distorting the truth to attract investors, and why they must be held fully accountable*. 

https://rijock.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-untouchable-facilitators-why-rcbi.html?m=1

The long-term consequences—where citizens of Dominica bear the brunt of a devalued passport, and investors are exposed to travel bans, financial loss, and the potential revocation of their citizenship—cannot be erased by the removal of a post.

True corrective action requires more than deleting a post; it requires a commitment to ending the culture of impunity that allows facilitators to operate outside the law while claiming ignorance. The evidence, including the images, serves as a public record of these practices. For these reasons, and in the interest of transparency and accountability, the article and its accompanying evidence will remain for now.

I hope you and your organization will consider the real impact of these 'marketing' choices on the people of Dominica. I encourage you to move beyond 'corrective actions' on your own platforms and instead advocate for a transparent, legal, and ethical CBI process that respects both the laws and the people of Dominica.

WHAT WILL THE EVIDENCE OF HAMILTON BANK'S SRI LANKA GOVERNMENT BOND TRADES SHOW?

If you read my recent article, posing this question: DID HAMILTON RESERVE BANK INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY MAKE A LARGE INVESTMENT, KNOWING THAT IT WOULD RESULT IN AN INABILITY TO PAY ITS DEPOSITORS ON DEMAND?

https://rijock.blogspot.com/2026/06/did-hamilton-reserve-bank-intentionally.html

then you know what specific issue concerns me. While I am certainly not qualified, not being a bond trader, to pass upon the propriety of the repeated purchases of Sri Lanka Government bonds, the facts are that the credit rating of Sri Lanka had fallen into the non-investment grade, also known as "junk," category in 2021, when the purchases started, and which worsened by 2022, when there was a sovereign default.

As one experienced financial professional explained, even a novice bond trader would have refrained from purchasing these instruments in 2021, as they were highly speculative. No explanation has ben offered to date as to why Hamilton officers chose to make such a high risk investment. Of course, it is up to a court of competent jurisdiction, acting as a trier of fact, to determine, based upon all the evidence available, whether an possible misconduct occurred, and we are hoping that, in at least one of the many pending cases, that findings of fact and conclusions of law answer our questions.

As we continue to review the pleadings in several of the pending proceedings in Nevis, we shall endeavor to shed more light on this troubling scandal. It is also important to note that the government regulator is also a party defendant in some of the litigation filed by depositors who consider themselves victims. Whether it is liable to the plaintiffs is yet another issue to be determined by the courts in Nevis.

ST. KITTS' BILZARIAN MONEY LAUNDERING INDICTMENT OPENS A CAN OF WORMS REGARDING RUMOURS OF SALE OF ANTIGUA'S GOVERNMENT-OWNED CARIBBEAN UNION BANK (CUB) TO CHINA

The scandal surrounding the $50m money laundering indictment filed in SaintKitts & Nevis against American corporate raider and fugitive from justice PAUL BILZARIAN, his wife, and a business partner who operates Bilzarian's business empire from Antigua, has reopened controversy over the bleeding financial wound in St. John's known as CARIBBEAN UNION BANK, which is majority government owned and in fiscal difficulty.

Reportedly, Antigua's PM GASTON BROWNE, who previously attempted to get Bilzarian to buy shares of the bank, first those held by his family, and then later the entire 80% owned by the Government of Antigua, back in 2025. There are also rumours that, following the collapse of that transaction, Browne offered the bank stock to an unidentified Nigerian businessman. Unfortunately, no further information is available on that unsuccessful attempt to bring in a new party to recapitalize the bank from an African source.

Finally, there apparently has been a more recent interest in the acquisition of CUB; this was was reportedly from a Chinese financial entity. Given that such matters do not occur without securing prior approval at the highest levels of government in China, we see this as an additional effort by China to exert a level of control over Antigua's decision makers. If it comes to fruition, such a transaction will be seen as an unfriendly act by the Government of the United States, which is actively seeking to reduce China's role in the Eastern Caribbean. The current American administration has made it clear that it regards the Caribbean as its Sphere of Influence, to the exclusion of all outside powers, pursuant to the Monroe Doctrine, whose Roosevelt Corollary should give Antigua pause, should it contemplate selling an indigenous bank to a Chinese company.

One additional and serious wrinkle: CUB had an incestuous relationship with another indigenous bank, GLOBAL BANK OF COMMERCE, now under administration, and their connection reportedly included substantial transfers from Venezuela, which means that there may be connections revealed in the NICOLAS MADURO MOROS case (SDNY), the ALEX SAAB MORAN case(SDFL) and a third as yet unfiled financial crime indictment also in SDFL. Will CUB turn out to be too hot to sell?