DISTRICT JUDGE: YOU HAVE A "FUNDAMENTAL DUTY" TO CONFIRM YOUR AI RESEARCH, OR THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES.

Buried towards the end of the latest court ruling in the $2m judgment for Defamation, entered against MY PILLOW owner, MIKE LINDELL, is a scathing attack on Lindell's attorneys, who used AI for research, and failed to check what the program gave them as legal authority, when they cited it to the Court. The trial Judge pointed out the serious factual errors, regarding the court decision they cited. See the portion attached hereto.

The judge ruled that they had a FUNDAMENTAL DUTY to check all the material that artificial intelligence they proffered to the Court, and it appears that their negligence will possibly result in sanctions where they hold their law licenses.

Compliance officers, when you use AI to conduct due diligence, ALWAYS check the results independently through a known, trusted resource. Failing that,, you could approve or disapprove a new client, based upon fictitious "information," which might come back and bite you, and your bank, later. Check your AI results, please, every time.