WE EXPLAIN THE ESSENCE OF THE ATTEMPTED REAL ESTATE FRAUD, WHICH WAS FACILITATED BY THE USE OF AN ANGUILLA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS CORPORATION IMPROPERLY OBTAINED

Before we proceed with our analysis of the situation, regarding the approval of a deceptively similar company by a government agency in Anguilla, we wish to explain the consequences that resulted from this improper action. The fraudster, Saint Martin attorney ELVIA MOENIR ALAM, had her sights upon a parcel of real property owned by the victim under the names of the original Anguilla company, and she clearly intended to take possession of it, through the new company, whose name was the same as the original entity which was in title; only the suffix was different, and such minute and minor details are often disregarded as clerical errors, so long as the names themselves match.

Of course, the law is clear regarding the subject, a company formed in the future with the same or similar name to one perviously formed and no longer current in its filings, does not acquire the assets of its predecessor. Registering the same name does not give you rights to the original company's bank accounts, property, or other holdings. This is a matter of black letter law, and is not subject to any other interpretation.

We know from the litigation that litigation initiated by the attorney-fraudster failed, as the Saint Maarten Court ruled in favor of the victim. See READ THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE SUCCESSFUL LAWSUIT AGAINST THE SINT MAARTEN ATTORNEY-FRAUDSTER IN OUR INVESTIGATION
https://lnkd.in/eNBZpBUW

Therefore, by definition, the efforts of the fraudster to set up her ability to take possession of the victim''s real estate, located in St. Martin, was illegal and improper, and forbidden by operation of law. We trust that this issue has now been clarified, and that readers will now be able to follow our investigation as it unfolds in the succeeding articles.