Why Enhanced Due Diligence, you ask. Here are some of the major challenges that EDD alone can meet:
(1) The majority of CBI applicants are from Asian and Middle Eastern countries, where the official langauges are in non-Latin alphabets. This means that legal names of applicants must not only be expressed in English, they must be transliterated into the Western alphabet. This is a recipe for illegal alteration of the identity of the applicant, into an alias that will not come back to his history, defeating the invetigation's purpose.
(2) Several of the jurisdictions that are attracting many applicants to the CBI program contain internationally-sanctioned individuals and entities, terrorist organizations, sanctions evaders, organized crime syndicates, terrorist financiers, and countries that are state sponsors of terrorism. All applicants from these high-risk nations demand an extremely high level of inquiry, which can only be adequately addressed by the broad scope of Enhanced Due Diligence.
(3) Organized crime members from the high risk countries, as well as intelligence agents, may employ counterfeit or altered forms of personal identification, and Due Diligence-level inquiries do not examine, with attention to detail, such documents, to determine their validity. Only Enhanced Due Diligence procedures, which are sensitive to the probability of forged and counterfeit documents, will actually discern the bogus identity documents, whereas simple Due Diligence procedures will not spot them.
Only through Enhanced Due Diligence procedures can the East Caribbean CBI states separate the dangerous and unsuitable criminal elements from the legitimate CBI applicants. Anything less than EDD will result in continued compliance failures in the CBI republics, and the embarrasing public exposure of more CBI passport-equipped criminals and sanctions evaders in global media. The East Caribbean Stares must employ EDD to remove them during the initial application process.